Thursday, December 17, 2009

How has Israel contributed to the education of Egypt?

Posted by Iqbal Tamimi on December 16, 2009 at 6:30am

By Iqbal Tamimi

It has been said that Westerners contributed somehow to the education of the nations which they conquered in Asia and Africa in the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. (This includes Israel, which really is an enclave of Western colonialism.) It has been claimed that the Colonial Powers--Britain, France, Israel, and other Western countries--actually benefitted the countries that they ruled.

Is this true, or simply an excuse for brutal and oppressive imperialism that continues to cause misery for millions in these countries today?

Egypt is one of the nations that lost a great deal economically and in human lives because of Israel. How has Israel contributed to educating the Egyptians? What have the Egyptians learned from the Israeli occupation?
It seems a great deal.

The latest contribution by Israel to Egyptian knowledge is demolition tactics. Egypt has been well known over the centuries as a country that builds famous works like the Pyramids, but it seems this is no longer the case. The new era of demolition is here, and the first victim in Egypt is a new hospital built for deprived and extremely poor Egyptians who can’t afford the price of medication. The hospital mentioned is being demolished because it was built by the Muslim Brotherhood.

The state claims that the reason behind demolishing a hospital that has already cost $7..3 million to build is that the structure violates building regulations.

Egypt has never punished any of the murderers and the fat cats who erected buildings with cheap materials and collapsed, killing hundreds, during the last earthquakes. Yet now the Egyptian Government argues a hospital for poor people doesn't pass its byzantine building code because the height of its walls is more than allowed and the building is larger than the area permitted.

It is quite obvious that no rational government would choose to send $7.3 million of charity money down the drain, except for political reasons. The Muslim Brotherhood is the largest opposition group in Egypt and won five seats in parliament in elections of 2005. But since the group is officially banned, its candidates run as independents and its members are routinely arrested.

The hospital was built with 250 beds for the poorest people in Egypt [was it finished? How long ago was it built? I think adding these details would strengthen your article]. The Cairo governate's "construction" (destruction) workers started the demolition procedure using machines and pneumatic crackers to break down the walls of the Islamic charity hospital a week ago. Dr Medhat Assem, Chairman of the Islamic Medical Association, said at a press conference last Wednesday that the hospital was established on a land donated by President Hosni Mubarak himself more than 10 years ago.

More importantly, Assem claimed that the hospital had authorizations by the district authorities of Nasr City to build three floors and a basement on the entire land area, and that the legal dispute with the Cairo governorate began when the Governing Council requested the expansion of the construction on the rest of the land.

It was further revealed by Mr Assem that the Islamic Medical Centre received judgments against the judicial district of Nasr City in 2001 and 2004 recognizing its entitlement to expand construction over the entire land area. So, the hospital is legally entitled to build, and there was no legal reason for the Cairo governate to demolish the building.

But demolition of buildings is not the only lesson Egypt has learned from Israel! Israel is well known for erecting high apartheid walls to make the life of Palestinians a total misery. Egypt is practicing this as well, but instead of high walls, it is building a wall of steel UNDERGROUND. This wall will be manufactured in the United States, and will be fitted like a jigsaw underground to block the only way Palestinians can have access to food and building materials.

Urgently needed consumer goods have been smuggled through underground tunnels for years to the Gaza Strip. Buildings and infrastructure (including the electricity and water systems) in the Strip were totally destroyed after the Israeli operation ‘ Cast Lead’ a year ago, but the population of 1.5 million of Gaza had been surviving on food and medicine brought through the tunnels far longer than that, ever since the siege of Gaza by sea, land and sky began its stranglehold four years ago.

It is a bread-proof wall. BBC has reported that the super strength steel bomb proof wall will be10-11km (6-7 miles) long and will extend 18 metres underground. It will be built from strong steel and most important of all American army engineers are involved, showing how heavily involved America is in the imprisonment and starvation of Gaza's people.

Can anyone see a pattern here? The US is involved in building a wall that is bread proof between Egypt and Palestine. And the US is the biggest funding provider for the Israeli apartheid state which has built the apartheid wall around Bethlehem, imprisoning millions of Palestinians behind the wall, restricting their movements and depriving them from their right to work on their farms. What else the Egyptian learned from Israel?

Oh yes, Egyptians have learned to attack journalists like mad dogs, hindering the work of anyone who dares to show the rest of the world how human rights are crushed under the state boots. Editors were brought to court in 2008: Ibrahim Eissa, editor of the daily Al-Dustour; Wael al-Abrashy, former editor of the weekly Sawt Al-Umma; Adel Hammouda, editor of the weekly Al-Fajr; and Abdel Halim Kandil, former editor of the weekly Al-Karama, who was accused of spreading false information about Mubarak and his top aides. Hossam al-Wakeel, a reporter for Al-Dustour, was arrested in September while covering protests over the closing of a private school in Alexandria. In April, interpreter Mohammed Salah Ahmed Maree was detained while working with James Buck, a U.S. photographer covering riots in the northern industrial city of Mahalla al-Kubra. Also, bloggers like Abdel Karim Suleiman have been detained. In 2007, he was sentenced to four years in prison for defaming Islam and Mubarak, and he has since suffered poor health at Borg Al-Arab Prison. The prosecution of Suleiman, also known as Karim Amer, is the first of its kind since he was the first Egyptian blogger to stand trial for his work.

Imprisoning and detaining journalists and bloggers is another lesson Egypt has learned from Israel... and the free education is still going on. What next?????

Found @ PALESTINIAN MOTHERS
~

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Christmas is im Eimer!

(Thats what happens if you mix English and German ...)

When the snow falls wunderbar
and the children happy are,
when the Glatteis on the street
and we all a Gluehwein need,
then you know, es ist soweit:
She is here, the Weihnachtszeit!

Every Parkhaus ist besetzt,
weil die people fahren jetzt
all to Kaufhof, medimarkt,
kriegen nearly Herzinfarkt,
shoppen hirnverbrannts things
and the Christmasglocke rings.

Merry Christmas, merry Christmas,
hear the music, see the lights,
frohe Weihnacht, frohe Weihnacht,
Merry Christmas allerseits.

Mother in the kitchen bakes
Schoko-, Nuss- und Mandelkeks,
daddy in the Nebenraum
Schmuecks a riesen Weihnachtsbaum.
He is hanging auf the balls
then he from the Leiter falls ...

Finally the Kinderlein
to the Zimmer kommen rein
and es sings the family
schauerlich "Oh Christmastree ...!"
And the jeder in the house
is packing die Geschenke aus.

Frohe Weihnacht, frohe weihnacht,
Merry Christmas allerseits ...

Mama finds unter der Tanne
eine brandnew Teflon-Pfanne
Papa gets a schlips und Socken
everybody does frohlocken.
President speaks in TV,
all around is Harmonie,
bis mother in the kitchen runs
im Ofen burns the Weihnachtsgans.

And so comes die Feuerwehr
with tatue, tata daher
and they bring a long long Schlauch
and a long long Leiter auch
and they schrei "Wasser marsch .."
Christmas is now im ... Eimer!

Merry Christmas, merry Christmas,
hear the music, see the lights,
frohe Weihnacht, frohe Weihnacht
Merry Christmas allerseits ...
~
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!!!
~

Two Candles in Congress Against the Siege of Gaza

Submitted by robert naiman on 16 December 2009 - 1:49pm

Many Americans don't realize that although it might be true that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee can get seventy Senators to sign a napkin, that doesn't mean AIPAC can stop Members of Congress from taking actions to improve U.S. policy towards the Palestinians - actions that could have a real impact in improving living conditions for Palestinians on the ground. This week two such measures are being considered by Members of the House.
Representatives Jim McDermott [D-WA-7] and Keith Ellison [D-MN-5] are circulating a letter that calls on President Obama to press for an easing in the Israeli blockade of Gaza by making it easier for Palestinians, aid workers, and journalists to enter and leave Gaza and by improving the access of Palestinian civilians to necessities such as clean water, food, fuel and medicine.

The McDermott-Ellison letter asks for "immediate improvement" in the following areas:

- Movement of people, especially students, the ill, aid workers, journalists, and those with family concerns, into and out of Gaza;

- Access to clean water, including water infrastructure materials,

- Access to plentiful and varied food and agricultural materials


- Access to medicine and health care products and suppliers

- Access to sanitation supplies, including sanitation infrastructure materials

- Access to construction materials for repairs and rebuilding;

- Access to fuel;

- Access to spare parts;

- Prompt passage into and out of Gaza for commercial and agricultural goods; and

- Publication and review of the list of items prohibited to the people of Gaza.

Representatives Jim Moran [D-VA-8] and Bob Inglis [R-SC-4] are circulating a letter that specifically focuses on the right of university students from Gaza to complete their studies: the letter calls on Secretary of State Clinton to put pressure on the Israeli government to allow students from Gaza to travel to study at West Bank universities.

The Moran-Inglis letter notes that the Israeli government has banned such travel since 2000, despite a ruling of the Israeli High Court that allowing Gazans to study in the West Bank would likely have "positive humane implications," and despite the fact that in practical terms, for many students in Gaza, especially young women, not being able to study in the West Bank means not being able to pursue their education at all. The letter notes the recent case of Berlanty Azzam, deported to Gaza by Israeli authorities two months before she was due to complete her degree at Bethlehem University, despite the lack of any Israeli government claim that allowing Berlanty to complete her degree threatened the security of the state of Israel.

The deadline for Members to sign both letters is Friday, December 18. You can ask your Representative in Congress to sign both letters here.
~
SOURCE
~

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Police shoot U.S. student's laptop upon entry to Israel


I GUESS YOU COULD TAKE THAT AS A MESSAGE ...



... "WELCOME TO ISRAEL" !!!




Last update - 19:35 15/12/2009

By Bar Ben Ari and Or Hirshauga, The Marker Correspondents

Israel Border Police officers shot at an American student's laptop as she entered Israel via Taba, Egypt, two weeks ago.

Lily Sussman, 21, wrote on her blog that border police subjected her to two hours of questioning and searches prior to shooting her Apple Macbook three times.

"They had pressed every sock and scarf with a security device, ripped open soap and had me strip extra layers. They asked me tons of questions?where are you going?" Sussman wrote, describing the experience.

"Who do you know? Do you have a boyfriend? Is he Arab, Egyptian, Palestinian? Why do you live in Egypt? Why not Israel? What do you know about the 'conflict' here? What do you think? They quizzed me on Judaism, which I know nothing about," she continued.

Sussman said that she then heard an announcement on the loudspeaker. "It was something along the lines of, 'Do not to be alarmed by gunshots because the Israeli security needs to blow up suspicious passenger luggage,'? she wrote on her blog.

Moments later a man came to her and introduced himself as the manager on duty. "I'm sorry but we had to blow up your laptop," Sussman said he told her.

"The security officers did not ask about my laptop prior to shooting it," Sussman told Daily News Egypt. "They used the word 'blew up' when they told me they destroyed my laptop. I don?t know why they shot it."

Sussman said the guards also looked through the photos saved on her camera, flipped through her journal and asked her about a map a friend had drawn for her that pointed out a main street, central bus station and the hostel where she was planning on stayig in Jerusalem.

She added that she had also been carrying an Arabic phrasebook, stamps from Syria, Qatar and the UAE and a Palestinians in Palestine guidebook.

The Israel Airports Authority said in response to the story: "A check that the lady's luggage underwent raised an indication that required security figures to act according to procedures. A police, who carried out the stated operation, was called to the scene. We suggest that the Israel Police be approached for any additional information."

Sussman managed to salvage the hard and guards gave her an address where she would be reimbursed for her mangled laptop, she told Daily news Egypt. "I'm going through the process of compensation," she said. "It supposedly will take about one month to receive the money."
~
SOURCE
~

U.S. tax dollars fund rabbi who excused killing gentile babies

DO I REALLY NEED TO ADD ANYTHING HERE?

WHAT IN THE WORLD DOES IT TAKE FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD (YES, PRESIDENT OBAMA AS WELL!!!) TO UNDERSTAND THEIR IDOLOGY, THEIR PHILOSOPHY OF ABSOLUTE SUPREMACY AND UTTER HATRED AND DISRESPECT OF EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING NON-JEWISH???

QUITE A WHILE BEFORE MY TIME, SOMEONE SHARED THIS PHILOSOPHY ... BUT IF I UTTER HIS NAME, I AM CALLED AN ANTISEMITE (happened countless times) WHEN, IN REALITY, ALL I DO IS STATE THE OBVIOUS!!

THIS is the "Rabbi" who stated that ...
... "it is permissible to kill gentile babies because of "the future danger that will arise if they are allowed to grow into evil people like their parents."

<>
By Akiva Eldar

The White House condemns the torching of a mosque, yet respectable Americans contribute to a yeshiva whose rabbi said it's okay to kill gentile babies. It is no surprise that the American administration tacitly, if unenthusiastically, accepted the excuse that the map of national priority zones the cabinet approved on Sunday does not violate the decision to freeze construction in the settlements.

How can President Barack Obama object to furthering education in a settlement like Yitzhar, located in the heart of the West Bank? After all, his own tax revenues contribute to the flourishing of the Od Yosef Chai Shechem yeshiva, the settlement's crowning glory.

This is the same yeshiva whose rabbi said it is permissible to kill gentile babies because of "the future danger that will arise if they are allowed to grow into evil people like their parents." In his latest book, the head of the yeshiva, Yitzhak Shapira, who bears the honorable title of rabbi, even permits killing anyone "who, through his remarks and so forth, weakens our kingdom" (Obama, beware!).

On November 17, this column reported that the Education Ministry's division for Torah institutions transferred more than NIS 1 million to this yeshiva in 2006 and 2007. The Welfare Ministry made do with a mere NIS 150,000.

A report on donations submitted by the yeshiva to the registrar of nonprofit organizations revealed that the American public also participates in financing the message coming out of Yitzhar. It states that in 2007 and 2008, the yeshiva received NIS 102,547 from an American foundation known as the Central Fund of Israel.

The American investigative reporter Philip Weiss says on his web site (mondoweiss.net) that money given to this fund is considered a tax-deductible donation. That means the thousands of shekels the fund sent to the settlement of Yitzhar were deducted from the donors' annual tax payments to the American treasury.

According to the fund's latest financial statement, it gave some $8 million to religious organizations in 2006, earmarked for establishing synagogues and schools, aiding the needy and "urgent security needs."

The fund's headquarters are located on the third floor of the Marcus Brothers Textiles store on Third Avenue in Manhattan. Its director is Jay Marcus, a resident of the settlement of Efrat.

His mother, Hadassah, is the fund's president and his father, Arthur, is vice president. Both parents live in New York.

The Washington Post's David Ignatius recently reported that according to statements filed with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, funds like that of the Marcus family sent some $33.4 million, tax free, to organizations affiliated with the settlements in 2004-07.

'Large forces, extensive damage'

So the next time the White House spokesman condemns the torching of a mosque near Nablus, some reporter ought to ask him why respectable American citizens contribute to the Od Yosef Chai Shechem yeshiva, one of whose leading rabbis wrote the following incendiary words of incitement: "[Civil] Administration inspectors have not dared to enter Yitzhar since the freeze edict. Their experience with Yitzhar, and its heat, are responsible for the fact that every entry into the settlement by hostile elements requires large forces and ends with extensive damage to army and police equipment, even greater damage to Arab persons and property, and a region that continues to burn in every direction for several days" (Rabbi Yosef Elitzur, Hakol Hayehudi, December 4, 2009).

At the same time, U.S. officials could consider how a tax exemption for donors to Friends of Ateret Cohanim and The City of David jibes with official American policy regarding the presence of right-wing Jewish organizations in the heart of Palestinian neighborhoods in Jerusalem's Holy Basin.

Human rights organizations and Jewish peace activists in the United States have started giving information to the authorities about foundations that support dubious right-wing organizations in Israel. They are asking why the administration only shuts down funds that send charitable donations to associations affiliated with Hamas.

Cut off from their families

Gilad Shalit's prolonged isolation from the outside world is one of the most serious and justified complaints Israel has against his captors in Hamas' leadership. But last week, Israel's Supreme Court gave its stamp of approval to a prolonged lack of contact between hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and their parents, children and grandchildren.

For two and a half years, starting shortly after Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip, the Israeli authorities have barred relatives of more than 500 prisoners from entering Israeli territory.

But a panel of three justices unanimously rejected a petition from a group of prisoners and 13 human rights organizations that argued, among other things, that the Fourth Geneva Convention entitles every prisoner "to receive visitors, especially near relatives, at regular intervals and as frequently as possible." Whenever possible, prisoners should be allowed to visit their homes in "urgent cases," the convention adds.

The petitioners also noted that paragraph 1 of the Prisons Ordinance states that visits are one of the most important means of contact between the prisoner and his family and friends. A visit can make it easier for a prisoner to endure his confinement and encourage him in times of crisis.

Regular visits

Following a ruling by the European Court of Justice, the petition pointed out, Turkey allowed family members to pay weekly visits to Abdullah Ocalan, the head of the Kurdish PKK organization, whose death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment and who is detained under special security conditions.

But nevertheless, there is a difference. Unlike Gilad Shalit, who in three years has received only one or two letters from his parents, the Palestinian prisoners are visited regularly by the Red Cross and are in mail and telephone contact with their families.

On the other hand, unlike Hamas - which many countries define as a terrorist organization - Israel is committed to upholding international treaties and is supposed to abide by different humanitarian rules.
~
SOURCE
`

Monday, December 14, 2009

What Christians Don't Know About Israel

Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S. policy? President Bill Clinton as well as most members of Congress support Israel-and they know why. U.S. Jews sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers.

The answer to achieving an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere-among those who support Israel but don't really know why. This group is the vast majority of Americans. They are well-meaning, fair-minded Christians who feel bonded to Israel-and Zionism-often from atavistic feelings, in some cases dating from childhood.

I am one of those. I grew up listening to stories of a mystical, allegorical, spiritual Israel. This was before a modern political entity with the same name appeared on our maps. I attended Sunday School and watched an instructor draw down window- type shades to show maps of the Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a Good and Chosen people who fought against their Bad "unChosen" enemies.

In my early 20s, I began traveling the world, earning my living as a writer. I came to the subject of the Middle East rather late in my career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge regarding the area. About all I knew was what I had learned in Sunday School.

And typical of many U.S. Christians, I somehow considered a modern state created in 1948 as a homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as a replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard about as a child. When in 1979 I initially went to Jerusalem, I planned to write about the three great monotheistic religions and leave out politics. "Not write about politics?" scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a water pipe in the Old Walled City. "We eat politics, morning, noon and night!"

As I would learn, the politics is about land, and the co-claimants to that land: the indigenous Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000 years and the Jews who started arriving in large numbers after the Second World War. By living among Israeli Jews as well as Palestinian Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard, smelled, experienced the police state tactics Israelis use against Palestinians.

My research led to a book entitled Journey to Jerusalem. My journey not only was enlightening to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own country. I say sadder understanding because I began to see that, in Middle East politics, we the people are not making the decisions, but rather that supporters of Israel are doing so. And typical of most Americans, I tended to think the U.S. media was "free" to print news impartially.

"It shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel."

In the late 1970s, when I first went to Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could and would classify "news" depending on who was doing what to whom. On my initial visit to Israel-Palestine, I had interviewed dozens of young Palestinian men. About one in four related stories of torture.

Israeli police had come in the night, dragged them from their beds and placed hoods over their heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant noises, hung them upside down and had sadistically mutilated their genitals. I had not read such stories in the U.S. media. Wasn't it news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors simply didn't know it was happening.

On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had been brutally tortured. And I'd make them available to him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began to realize what I hadn't known: had it been Jews who were strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews with tortured Arabs were "lost" at WETA.

The process of getting my book Journey to Jerusalem published also was a learning experience. Bill Griffin, who signed a contract with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing Company, was a former Roman Catholic priest. He assured me that no one other than himself would edit the book. As I researched the book, making several trips to Israel and Palestine, I met frequently with Griffin, showing him sample chapters. "Terrific," he said of my material.

The day the book was scheduled to be published, I went to visit MacMillan's. Checking in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across a room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary Margie came to greet me. In tears, she whispered for me to meet her in the ladies room. When we were alone, she confided, "He's been fired." She indicated it was because he had signed a contract for a book that was sympathetic to Palestinians. Griffin, she said, had no time to see me.

Later, I met with another MacMillan official, William Curry. "I was told to take your manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them read it for mistakes," he told me. "They were not pleased. They asked me, ‘You are not going to publish this book, are you?' I asked, ‘Were there mistakes?' ‘Not mistakes as such. But it shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel.'"

Somehow, despite obstacles to prevent it, the presses had started rolling. After its publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a number of churches. Christians generally reacted with disbelief. Back then, there was little or no coverage of Israeli land confiscation, demolition of Palestinian homes, wan ton arrests and torture of Palestinian civilians.

The Same Question

Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard the same question, "How come I didn't know this?" Or someone might ask, "But I haven't read about that in my newspaper." To these church audiences, I related my own learning experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S. correspondents covering a relatively tiny state. I pointed out that I had not seen so many reporters in world capitals such as Beijing, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris. Why, I asked, did a small state with a 1980 population of only four million warrant more reporters than China, with a billion people?

I also linked this query with my findings that The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post-and most of our nation's print media-are owned and/or controlled by Jews supportive of Israel. It was for this reason, I deduced, that they sent so many reporters to cover Israel-and to do so largely from the Israeli point of view.

My learning experiences also included coming to realize how easily I could lose a Jewish friend if I criticized the Jewish state. I could with impunity criticize France, England, Russia, even the United States. And any aspect of life in America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more Jewish friends than one after the publication of Journey to Jerusalem-all sad losses for me and one, perhaps, saddest of all.

In the 1960s and 1970s, before going to the Middle East, I had written about the plight of blacks in a book entitled Soul Sister, and the plight of American Indians in a book entitled Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The Illegals. These books had come to the attention of the "mother" of The New York Times, Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger.

Her father had started the newspaper, then her husband ran it, and in the years that I knew her, her son was the publisher. She invited me to her fashionable apartment on Fifth Avenue for lunches and dinner parties. And, on many occasions, I was a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn. home.

She was liberal-minded and praised my efforts to speak for the underdog, even going so far in one letter to say, "You are the most remarkable woman I ever knew." I had little concept that from being buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I discovered-from her point of view-the "wrong" underdog.

As it happened, I was a weekend guest in her spacious Connecticut home when she read bound galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was leaving, she handed the galleys back with a saddened look: "My dear, have you forgotten the Holocaust?" She felt that what happened in Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier should silence any criticism of the Jewish state. She could focus on a holocaust of Jews while negating a modern day holocaust of Palestinians.

I realized, quite painfully, that our friendship was ending. Iphigene Sulzberger had not only invited me to her home to meet her famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The Times had requested articles. I wrote op-ed articles on various subjects including American blacks, American Indians as well as undocumented workers. Since Mrs. Sulzberger and other Jewish officials at the Times highly praised my efforts to help these groups of oppressed peoples, the dichotomy became apparent: most "liberal" U.S. Jews stand on the side of all poor and oppressed peoples save one-the Palestinians.

How handily these liberal Jewish opinion-molders tend to diminish the Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to categorize them all as "terrorists."

Interestingly, Iphigene Sulzberger had talked to me a great deal about her father, Adolph S. Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the early Zionists. He had not favored the creation of a Jewish state.

Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen victim to Zionism, a nationalistic movement that passes for many as a religion. While the ethical instructions of all great religions-including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and Christ-stress that all human beings are equal, militant Zionists take the position that the killing of a non-Jew does not count.

Over five decades now, Zionists have killed Palestinians with impunity. And in the 1996 shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the Israelis killed more than 100 civilians sheltered there. As an Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit, explains of the massacre, "We believe with absolute certitude that right now, with the White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and The New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not count the same way as our own."

Israelis today, explains the anti-Zionist Jew Israel Shahak, "are not basing their religion on the ethics of justice. They do not accept the Old Testament as it is written. Rather, religious Jews turn to the Talmud. For them, the Talmudic Jewish laws become ‘the Bible.' And the Talmud teaches that a Jew can kill a non-Jew with impunity."

In the teachings of Christ, there was a break from such Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal the wounded, to comfort the downtrodden.

The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is that having made an icon of Israel, we fall into a trap of condoning whatever Israel does-even wanton murder-as orchestrated by God.

Yet, I am not alone in suggesting that the churches in the United States represent the last major organized support for Palestinian rights. This imperative is due in part to our historic links to the Land of Christ and in part to the moral issues involved with having our tax dollars fund Israeli-government-approved violations of human rights.

While Israel and its dedicated U.S. Jewish supporters know they have the president and most of Congress in their hands, they worry about grassroots America-the well-meaning Christians who care for justice. Thus far, most Christians were unaware of what it was they didn't know about Israel. They were indoctrinated by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own country and when they traveled to the Land of Christ most all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being the case, it was unlikely a Christian ever met a Palestinian or learned what caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

This is gradually changing, however. And this change disturbs the Israelis. As an example, delegates attending a Christian Sabeel conference in Bethlehem earlier this year said they were harassed by Israeli security at the Tel Aviv airport.

"They asked us," said one delegate, "‘Why did you use a Palestinian travel agency? Why didn't you use an Israeli agency?'" The interrogation was so extensive and hostile that Sabeel leaders called a special session to brief the delegates on how to handle the harassment. Obviously, said one delegate, "The Israelis have a policy to discourage us from visiting the Holy Land except under their sponsorship. They don't want Christians to start learning all they have never known about Israel."

* Washington, DC-based writer Grace Halsell is the author of 14 books, including Journey to Jerusalem and Prophecy and Politics.
~
Found @ Haitham's blog - THANKS HAITHAM!
~

Jewish town won't let Arab build home on his own land

"Don't waste your time," he reportedly told Suad. "We'll keep you waiting for 30 years."

IF THIS IS NOT RACISM - I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS!!!

Aadel Suad first came to the planning and construction committee of the Misgav Local Council in 1997. Suad, an educator, was seeking a construction permit to build a home on a plot of land he owns in the community of Mitzpeh Kamon. The reply he got, from a senior official on the committee, was a memorable one.

"Don't waste your time," he reportedly told Suad. "We'll keep you waiting for 30 years."

For Suad it's now been 12 years of fighting the committee's red tape to build a home on his own land. The reason, as far as he and his family are concerned, is singular: The local council doesn't want Arabs, with or without the legal amendments legalizing such objection that passed preliminary reading in the Knesset this week.

"We didn't invade the plot and we didn't take over the land," Suad says. "My grandfather has been here since the Turks. We have a land registry document proving ownership of three acres."

Suad's plot is on the northern edge of the hilltop community, founded in 1979. In 1984, Suad's land, along with others, was redefined as a development area rather than agricultural land. The land was divided into two plots. Suad and his family, who have been living in shacks on the site, were not informed.

"In 1990 we got a notice to pay capital gains taxes on the land, and they only told us about the changes when we asked for an explanation," he says.

The plots were split between the family and the Israel Land Administration. Only one plot was owned by the family - half an acre, minus half a square meter owned by the ILA.

Having paid the tax, Suad asked for a written confirmation of the change. "This usually takes a couple of days," he says. "They dragged it on for 8 months." While repeatedly refusing to sell the land or swap it for a plot outside Kamon, Suad was told that his plot is jointly owned by the ILA, because of the 50 square centimeters.

"They asked me for a document stating the ILA was giving up their part in the plot," Suad says. "It took the ILA another 4 years."

In 2007, the planning committee finally gave the construction permit, under four conditions: Suad would promise to demolish his shack, the future house would be moved by some 12 meters, Suad would contribute a part of the land to public needs, and he himself would ensure the house is connected to all infrastructure. Suad agreed to everything, but then found that no sewage line extended to his land. His suggestion to install a cesspit was rejected, despite this being a common practice in the community.

"I even offered to pave the 150 meters of the road at my own expense," Suad said. "We were supposed to meet about it on December 8, but then they told me the meeting was off."

"It's clear that the threat I heard in 1997 is coming true. They don't want us here. But I'll keep fighting until my children and I live on our private land," he said.

The Misgav Local Council rejected the accusations. The council said Suad's plot is located far from the other homes of the community and has no roads, sidewalks, lighting, water or sewer. All these would need to be connected through other plots, some of which are privately owned, the council said.

The council also said Suad's construction permit was conditioned on coming up with a plan to connect the plot to infrastructure, which he failed to produce in sufficient detail, or to accompany it with permits.
~
SOURCE
~

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

JEWISH IN SYRIA ...

... a good example that the Arab Jews are 'Arabs' and they enjoy their freedom of worship unlike the Muslims in Palestine and Christians under Israel's discrimination policies, I hope this video will be circulated for the Zionists who claim that the Jews were forced out of their properties in Arab countries.

Afghan widows struggle for survival

Monday, December 07, 2009

Der Apfent - Eine kleine Weihnachtsgeschichte

FOR MY GERMAN SPEAKING READERS -
- AN ADVENT STORY WRITTEN BY A CHILD ...
~
... IT MADE ME LAUGH TEARS!!!


Der Apfent ist die schönste Zeit vom Winter.

Die meisten Leute haben im Winter eine Grippe. Die ist mit Fieber.
Wir haben auch eine, aber die ist mit Beleuchtung und man schreibt sie mit K.

Drei Wochen bevor das Christkindl kommt stellt Papa die Krippe im Wohnzimmer auf und meine kleine Schwester und ich dürfen mithelfen.

Viele Krippen sind langweilig, aber die unsere nicht, weil wir haben mords tolle Figuren drin. Ich habe einmal den Josef und das Christkindl auf den Ofen gestellt damit sie es schön warm haben und es war ihnen zu heiß. Das Christkindl ist schwarz geworden und den Josef hat es auf lauter Trümmer zerrissen. Ein Fuß von ihm ist bis in den Platzlteig geflogen und es war kein schöner Anblick. Meine Mama hat mich geschimpft und gesagt, dass nicht einmal die Heiligen vor meiner Blödheit sicher sind.

Wenn Maria ohne Mann und ohne Kind herumsteht, schaut es nicht gut aus. Aber ich habe gottseidank viele Figuren in meiner Spielzeugkiste und der Josef ist jetzt der Donald Duck. Als Christkindl wollte ich den Asterix nehmen, weil der ist als einziger so klein, dass er in den Futtertrog gepasst hätte. Da hat meine Mama gesagt, man kann doch als Christkindl keinen Asterix hernehmen, da ist ja das verbrannte Christkindl noch besser. Es ist zwar schwarz, aber immerhin ein Christkindl.

Hinter dem Christkindl stehen zwei Oxen, ein Esel, ein Nilpferd und ein Brontosaurier. Das Nilpferd und den Brontosaurier habe ich hineingestellt, weil der Ox und der Esel waren zu langweilig.

Links neben dem Stall kommen gerade die heiligen drei Könige daher.

Ein König ist dem Papa im letzten Apfent beim Putzen heruntergefallen und war dodal hin. Jetzt haben wir nur mehr zwei heilige Könige und einen heiligen Batman als Ersatz.

Normal haben die heiligen drei Könige einen Haufen Zeug für das Christkindl dabei, nämlich Gold, Weihrauch und Pürree oder so ähnlich.

Von den unseren hat einer anstatt Gold ein Kaugummipapierl dabei, das glänzt auch schön. Der andere hat eine Marlboro in der Hand, weil wie keinen Weihrauch haben. Aber die Marlboro raucht auch schön wenn man sie anzündet. Der heilige Batman hat eine Pistole dabei. Das ist zwar kein Geschenk für das Christkindl, aber damit kann er es vor dem Saurier beschützen.

Hinter den drei Heiligen sind ein paar rothäutige Indianer und ein kasiger Engel. Dem Engel ist ein Fuß abgebrochen, darum haben wir ihn auf ein Motorrad gesetzt, damit er sich leichter tut. Mit dem Motorrad kann er fahren, wenn er nicht gerade fliegt.

Rechts neben dem Stall haben wir ein Rotkäppchen hingestellt. Sie hat eine Pizza und drei Weizen für die Oma dabei. Einen Wolf haben wir nicht, darum lurt hinter dem Baum ein Bummerl als Ersatzwolf hervor.

Mehr steht in unserer Krippe nicht, aber das reicht voll. Am Abend schalten wir die Lampen an und dann ist unsere Krippe erst so richtig schön. Wir sitzen herum und singen Lieder vom Apfent. Manche gefallen mir aber die meisten sind mir zu lusert.

Mein Opa hat mir ein Gedicht vom Apfent gelernt und das gehr so:
„Apfent, Apfent, der Bärwurz(Schnaps) brennt. Erst trinkst oan, dann zwoa, drei, vier, dann hauts de mit deim Hirn an d`Tür.“ Obwohl dieses Gedicht recht schön ist, hat die Mama gesagt, dass ich mir es nicht merken darf.

Im Apfent wird auch gebastelt. Wir haben eine große Schüssel voll Nüsse und eine kleine mit Goldstaub. Darin wälzen wir die Nüsse bis sie golden sind, das Christkindl hängt sie später an den Christbaum. Man darf nicht fest schnaufen weil der Goldstaub ist dodal leicht und fliegt herum, wenn man hinschnauft. Einmal habe ich vorher in den Goldstaub ein Niespulver hineingetan und wie mein Vater die erste Nuss darin gewälzt hat, tat er einen Nieserer, dass es ihn gerissen hat und sein Gesicht war goldern und die Nuss nicht. Mama hat ihn geschimpft, weil er keine Beherrschung hat und sie hat gesagt, er stellt sich dümmer an als ein Kind.

Meinem Vater war es recht zuwider und er hat nicht mehr mitgetan. Er hat gesagt, dass mit dem Goldstaub irgendetwas nicht stimmt, und Mama hat gesagt, dass höchstens bei ihm etwas nicht stimmt. Ich habe mich sehr gefreut, weil es war insgesamt ein lustiger Apfentsabend.

Kurz vor Weihnachten müssen wir unser Wunschzettel schreiben. Meine Schwester wünscht sich meistens Puppen oder sonst ein Klump. Ich schreibe vorsichtshalber mehr Sachen auf und zum Schluss schreibe ich dem Christkindl, es soll einfach soviel kaufen bis das Geld ausgeht. Meine Mama sagt, das ist eine Unverschämtheit und irgendwann bringt mir das Christkindl gar nichts mehr, weil ich nicht bescheiden bin. Aber bis jetzt habe ich immer etwas gekriegt.

Wenn ich groß bin und ein Geld verdiene, dann kaufe ich mir selber etwas und bin überhaupt nicht bescheiden. Dann kann sich das Christkindl von mir aus ärgern, weil dann ist es mir wurscht.

Bis man schaut ist der Apfent vorbei und Weihnachten auch und mit dem Jahr geht es dahin. Die Geschenke sind ausgepackt und man kriegt bis Ostern nichts mehr, höchstens, wenn man vorher Geburtstag hat.

Aber eins ist gwies: der Apfent kommt wieder.
~

Saturday, December 05, 2009

Israel refuses Irish FM permission to visit Gaza


Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:33:41 GMT



Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs Michael Martin





Israeli authorities deny Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs Micheal Martin permission to visit the impoverished coastal sliver of Gaza which has long been under an Israeli siege.

Speaking at the Oireachtas Committee on European Affairs on Friday, Martin said no substantive reason had been given for the refusal.

"I just wanted to go in myself and see Gaza," he said according to the Irish Times newspaper.

Similar requests from other European countries had also been turned down.

The Irish Foreign Minister meanwhile described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'completely unacceptable.'

"If progress is not realized quickly, then the international community as a whole may need to reconsider what further pressure it can bring in favor of achieving a negotiated, two-state settlement," Martin told the committee.

Israel has imposed a crippling siege on the Gaza Strip since.

The Israeli army also launched a massive military offensive, known as 'Operation Cast Lead' against the coastal sliver in December 2008 and January 2009. More than 1,400 Palestinians were killed during the three-week offensive, which inflicted $ 1.6 billion of damage to the Gazan economy.

“I am appalled by the indiscriminate attacks by Israeli forces which have resulted in so many civilian fatalities. The death and suffering, as well as the humanitarian deprivation, now being inflicted on the people of Gaza as a result of the continuation of the Israeli Operation Cast Lead cannot be justified in any way and must now be brought to an immediate end," Martin stated.

Martin also called on Tel Aviv to provide further clear evidence it was 'serious about engaging in peace negotiations' rather than being more preoccupied with 'simply managing what could well escalate into a situation of incipient conflict.'

MP/MTM/DT
SOURCE
~